Overcoming Barriers to Diabetes Management in Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes by Leveraging Telehealth: A Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE: The LIFT-YA (leveraging intensive follow-up treatment in young adults) quality improvement program was developed to address clinical and social barriers in young adults (YA) with type 1 diabetes (T1D), using telehealth visits to promote clinic attendance and improve diabetes care. METHODS: LIFT-YA enrolled YA aged 18-30 with T1D and HbA1c >8% (64 mmol/mol) who had established adult care in our diabetes clinic. The 6-month, 7-visit hybrid program was facilitated by a case manager serving as the liaison between participants and the care team. The primary end-points were within-group and between-group changes from the baseline in HbA1c at the last visit and adoption of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). RESULTS: Of the 57 eligible YA, 24 were enrolled and 33 were unable to participate (UTP). Thirteen of the enrolled participants attended at least 4/7 visits ("completers", C), whereas 11 were noncompleters (NC). HbA1c at the end of the program was significantly lower in the C versus UTP group [median -1.0; IQR (-0.6, -2.5) vs -0.25 (0.2, -1.0) in UTP; P < .05]. The percentage of CGM users significantly increased by 70% in the C group (P < .05), but did not change in the NC and UTP groups. Limited access to telehealth and the high cost of frequent visits were the main hurdles preventing enrollment into or completion of the program. CONCLUSIONS: The LIFT-YA pathway was associated with a significant HbA1c reduction and an increase in the adoption of CGM. Policy changes are necessary to expand access to LIFT-YA and other programs for high-risk YA with T1D in underserved communities and across all backgrounds.

In-person and virtual multidisciplinary intensive lifestyle interventions are equally effective in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity.

Background: Intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) is essential for diabetes management. The Weight Achievement and Intensive Treatment (Why WAIT) program is a 12-week multidisciplinary weight management program that has been implemented in real-world clinical practice since 2005 and has shown long-term maintenance of weight reduction for 5 and 10 years. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the program went virtual using telemedicine and mobile health applications. Aims: This retrospective pilot study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a virtual model of an already established and successful in-person program for diabetes and weight management since 2005. Methods: We evaluated 38 patients with diabetes and obesity enrolled in the Why WAIT program between February 2019 and December 2020. Sixteen participants were enrolled in virtual program (VP) and were compared with 22 participants who completed the latest two physical programs (PPs) before COVID-19. We evaluated changes in body weight, A1C, blood pressure (BP), and lipid profile after 12 weeks of ILI. Results: Body weight decreased by -7.4 ± 3.6 kg from baseline in VP compared with -6.8 ± 3.5 kg in PP (p = 0.6 between groups). A1C decreased by -1.03% ± 1.1% from baseline in VP, and by -1.0% ± 1.2% in PP (p = 0.9 between groups). BP, lipid profile, and all other parameters improved in both groups with no significant difference between them. Conclusion: Virtual multidisciplinary ILI is as effective as the in-person intervention program in improving body weight, A1C, BP, and lipid profile, and in reducing the number of anti-hyperglycemic medications. Results from our study suggest that scaling the Why WAIT program in a virtual format to a larger population of patients with diabetes and obesity is feasible and is potentially as successful as the in-person program.

Hybrid model of intensive lifestyle intervention is potentially effective in patients with diabetes & obesity for post-COVID era.

The Weight Achievement and Intensive Treatment (Why WAIT) program is a 12-week multidisciplinary intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) for patients with diabetes and obesity in real-world clinical practice that has led to long-term weight loss maintenance for up to 10 years. During COVID-19, we reported that a virtual model (VM) of the program was equally effective in reducing body weight and improving glycemic control. Here, we test a newly-introduced hybrid model (HM), to accommodate ongoing restrictions of the pandemic. We evaluated 56 participants: 18 from HM, 16 from VM and 22 from the in-person model (iPM). At 12 weeks, mean change in body weight from baseline for HM was -8.2 ± 5.0 kg; p<0.001. Mean change in A1C for HM was -0.6 ± 0.6%; p=0.002. There were no significant differences in body weight reduction (p=0.7) or A1C reduction (p=0.6) between groups. Blood pressure, lipid profile, and all other parameters showed improvements without significant differences between groups. Overall, HM is as effective as VM and iPM in reducing body weight and A1C after 12 weeks. Given its scalability, HM could be offered to more patients with diabetes and obesity who may benefit from its increased flexibility and enhanced accountability without compromising the multidisciplinary approach for a post-COVID era.

Enhancing medication adherence in older adults at two nurse practitioner-owned clinics.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization identified medication adherence as the greatest opportunity to improve outcomes related to chronic disease. Adherence rates of 80% or greater, or taking medication as prescribed at least 80% of the time, can positively impact health outcomes. LOCAL PROBLEM: A prior study at two nurse practitioner (NP)-owned family practice clinics in New Hampshire measured medication adherence among adult type-2 diabetes mellitus (DM) patients at 77% and declining over a 4-year period. Patients' hemoglobin A1c rates were stagnant despite previous initiative to improve this biomarker. METHODS: Nurse practitioners were educated on provider-driven strategies to improve medication adherence in the older adult with DM, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. A review of medical records was performed on patients for 52 weeks before seminar and 13 weeks after seminar to capture medication adherence rates and clinical biomarkers. INTERVENTION: Pre- and postseminar data were analyzed to determine whether the seminar resulted in improved adherence and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Preseminar medication adherence rates exceeded evidence-based standards of 80% for each condition. Postseminar, statistically significant improved adherence rates were seen among DM patients with hypertension. Adherence worsened among hyperlipidemia patients, although this change was not statistically significant. Clinical biomarkers saw little change. CONCLUSIONS: This quality improvement project found that educating NPs on strategies to improve medication adherence can improve adherence among DM and hypertension patients. Continued education and measurement of adherence and clinical biomarkers are encouraged to capture more postseminar visits. This project adds to the growing body of knowledge about patients managed by NPs and NP-owned practices.